The technical approach is primarily focused on improving
the facade and came with the introduction of the climate facade.
In
the ecological approach however the building as a whole is considered.
The building is a system which exchanges energy with its environment
eliminating the need for fossil fuels.
The most fundamental approach is by thinking
about a more efficient use of our buildings before the actual designing
takes place. By new combinations of functions, double use and condensation
we can remain comfortable without using polluting energy sources.
A better (energy) performance
Already there are prototypes of self-providing buildings such as the
null-energy flat, the autarkic office and the plus-home. When these
buildings demonstrate that a good conditioned home/work environment
can be created without using polluting energy sources then similar buildings
will be generally accepted.
The design -task to come to self-providing buildings is defined in several
ways. The multitude of proposals and designs for energy-efficient buildings
becomes clear when several starting points are recognised.
-
The building as a machine that can run more efficiently
(the building and the climate installation are one).
-
The building as a system that can be organised
more efficiently. Not closed but as an open system in interaction
with its environment.
-
The building as a container of activities of which
the logistics can be improved. In other words, there can be a much
more efficient use of the hardware (the building), if we write the
software (the functions that it must fulfil) better.
technical:
the machine.... High-tech has become Eco-tech.
This mainly English architecture trend is currently using new technologies
to achieve a better energy performance of buildings. Because of social
inspiration but certainly also for self-preservation. The large glass
surface, traditionally an essential part of the High-tech vocabulary,
is as good as outlawed by the new environmental demands. The conventional
glass facade is very unfavourable for the energy housekeeping. In the
summer a lot of heat is collected, creating a heavy cooling burden.
Assisted by engineers the climate facade was developed as an answer
(see A+B document Klimaatgevels (climate facades), 12-1995; author Piet
Vollaard). Eco-tech has a pioneering roll in the development of new
facade systems and climate concepts.
While many architects rather hide the
climate installations in the darkest inside of pipe shafts and behind
lowered ceilings, the Eco-tech marks itself by a far-reaching integration
of building and climate conditioning system.
The facade is determined by the functions that it must fulfil; ventilate,
let light pass, cool, heat, generate energy and isolate.
ecological: life systems
A step further is to not only interpret the facade but the whole building
as a system. A system with an input and an output. The weather conditions
outside the building and the energy that is created by the activities
in the building can be utilised for optimising the inner climate. The
facade is then a filter between inside and outside that actively regulates
instead of passively protects. Buildings should be able to get energy
from their direct environment instead of obtaining it from a distance.
Preferably totally self-providing by interacting with the outside climate
and the users as an open system. Originally the idea behind the autarkic
building was anarchistic. In the 1970's the hippies retreated to the
Colorado countryside in order to avoid participating in the polluting
and in their eyes hypocritical capitalistic society. The idea of self-sufficient
buildings and social groups (communes) has received new strength because
of the environment and the need for larger energy efficiency.
The trace of duffel architecture has marked this ecological architecture
for a long time. In the meantime this approach is adopted by the white
shirts and black suits architecture..
Buildings should be able to get energy
from their direct environment instead of obtaining it from a distance
These buildings are not static products
and know many shapes dependent on conditions and seasons. For the storage
of energy, for example, systems exist that can store energy per 24 hour
period to even a period of a year. Usually invisible, but sometimes
also as part of the architecture, such as in a home designed by Robin
Spence, where energy is stored in water basins under the building.
Reprogramming
Surprising new concepts can arise by thinking about the organisation
of the activities in the future building before the actual designing.
Double use for example creates the opportunity to use energy that is
released by certain processes for a second function. In Ireland they
are working on a design for a combined ice-skate and swim paradise by
the design of Ian Ritchie. The energy that is released in cooling the
ice can be used for heating the water. The project City Fruitful near
Dordrecht is also an example of double use. In this project it was proposed
to combine housing- and greenhouse building. The energy required to
heat the greenhouses could be used to head the houses.
These kinds of projects are really successful
when the advantages are no only energy technical but also create extra
qualities in using them. Like City Fruitful where in a pleasant, green
living environment the grapes are growing till in front of the door.
Condensation
The programmatic condensation, the idea behind for example the compact
city, provides logistic advantages because the commutes are shorter.
Moreover when using the right cocktail of functions an energy-exchanging
synergy between parts of the city can come into existence. The atria
of the ministry of VROM in The Hague for example are meant as noise
buffers with as energetic advantage that the offices can be build with
windows that can opened. These atria moreover also have an important
function as the informal hallways that improve the integration between
the several services of VROM.
Building as third skin
A far reaching example of acting on programmatic level is confronting
the users themselves with their actions. When in the pre-design of the
new building of IBN-DLO in Wageningen it was proposed to request the
users to dress according to the season and conditions of their working
area the initial response was positive. The laboratory workers in the
well-conditioned laboratory facing north could that way be distinguished
from their colleagues in the offices facing south. Only at a later stage
this was met with resistance of a part of the co-workers, that would
travel a lot in the building or would have to go to representative or
casual outdoor meetings. At the Smart Materials workshop (Design Institute
(Vormgevingsinstituut) March 1998, Amsterdam), it was proposed to design
intelligent working clothes in which the individual demands are cared
for by a second skin. The building as third skin takes care of the right
basic conditions while the clothing takes care of the 'fine-tuning'..
Smart designs
Since the beginning of this century one experimented vehemently with
heating and climate conditioning systems. We continually increased our
demands on the optimal layout of the modern workspace and living environment
and to sufficiently condition these, our buildings are equipped with
energy eating installations. Energy was cheap and there seemed to be
more than enough. If the newest system didn't work then more machinery
and energy was put into the building under the motto "if it doesn't
work then we don't use enough of it". In the meantime it is clear
that burning of fossil fuels pollutes our environment, with climate
changes as a result. We therefore must migrate to buildings that house
a as optimal as possible living- and working environment with as little
energy as possible. In short, migrate to buildings with a better energy-achievement.